Is biography science? (12 facts you should know!)

Is Biography science?
Is biography science?

Confusion is what we fall into about whether biography is science or something else. And believe me, it is a very frustrating situation.

In this article, why explained in detail why biography is not science using new informations that is not available anywhere.

Is biography science?

Biography is not science!. It is a branch of literature that deals with the lives of individuals who made a mark on their life and the lives of other people.

Science and biography are two distinct things that are independent of each other in terms of approach, impact and acceptability.

Moreover, biography and science differed in more than twelve (12) different ways, as we analysed in this article below.

Why biography is not Science?

1. Scientific method of inquiry does not govern biographies.

Biographical research differs from science by its inability to use a scientific method of inquiry in carrying out research.

Science engaged in a method of measuring and arriving at a given result, which is in contrast with how biographical researches are conducted.

2. Future oriented, past events oriented.

Science is future oriented. Past events are not too relevant to it, while biography, on the other hand, is past events oriented.

Thus, biography takes events of the past as the main pillar of strength in conducting its own research for the purpose of bringing accurate answers to the reader.

3. Tracking of development.

In science, if the scientists discover a result after a long process of research, that result will be monitored to see whether it is performing according to the object and to record any fresh development arising from it.

While biography, on the other hand, does not require tracking of development because the facts don’t require any changes at all.

4. On conflict and arguments.

In Biography, conflicts and arguments are a continuous process, unlike science, where agreement is achievable when results are accurate.

5. Wider coverage.

Science aims at providing a general truths and deals with a wider range of issues more than biography, which deals with particular individuals biography, which deals with particular individuals and past events.

6. Expertise requirements.

A nonexpert can write biographies. While science requires a great deal of expertise on the individual conducting scientific research.

This disparity is as a result of the level of impact both science and biography can do to the lives of other people.

On the side of biography that the damage is very minimal if compared to other science counterpart.

Moreover, a mistake in scientific research has greater consequences on the lives of the people than a biography.

7. Uniform perspective in science, conflicting perspective in biography.

In science, if scientists conduct a research and discover the answer is to a problem, uniformly the scientists will come together and recognised the authenticity of the research.

While on the biography side, no matter the thoroughness and quality of the work, many people will disagree with that perspective and will hold opinion that are contrary to what is in your book.

8. Storytelling ability.

Biography deals with storytelling to make it more desirable to your eyes.

The higher the story is in terms of good writing technic the higher the chances of performing well in the market, while the lower the quality of the story, the lower the chance of success.

Meanwhile, science has nothing to do with good storytelling.

It stated the facts and reliable figures the way they are appear at discovery.

While on the biography side, no matter the thoroughness and quality of the work, many people will disagree with that perspective and will hold opinion that are contrary to what is in your book.

9. Unchangeable nature of facts.

In Biography, facts in the life of the person cannot be changed later because it is the actual evidence that happened in his or her life.

While science, on the other hand, constantly changes with the coming of additional evidence that is found by doing further research.

In Biography, you cannot change the life history of the person, while in science fresh evidences are discovered frequently.

10. What happened and what is going to happen analysis?

Biography deals more with what happened in the past (history) while science attempts to find out what will happen in the present and in the future.

However, both of them are important to help make the world a better place for all. No need to include any story, just the facts alone.

11. New knowledge discovery.

It does not create new knowledge in Biography as a result of lack scientific method of systematic testing, observations, measurement of a phenomenon, and repeated experiment of results.

While all the above-mentioned methods are the bedrock of scientific research and how science discovers new knowledge.

12. Calculation abilities.

Calculations surrounded science in other to find the results of research that help improve human lives.

While biography requires no calculation in the process of finding answers to its own research.

Relationships between biography and science.

1. Aim at finding the truth.

Both biography and science are working for the purpose of finding the truth about events and knowledge.

They rely on facts and figures that are not mixed with lies and deceit.

2. Both shape human lives.

Both biography and science contributed to the betterment of our lives in different ways.

They help us achieve our goals and objectives.

3. Involved lots of researches.

You can’t engage properly in both biography and science without getting yourself deep into research.

Research is the bedrock of scientific and biography.

4. Geared towards a better future.

Guarantying a better future to generations yet unborn is the main objective of science and biography, although their methods are different.

Science relies on discovery of data while biography on studying past notable individuals and their impacts for the future to improve on it.

5. Both are solutions to problems.

Both science and biography are solutions to lots of problems affecting people.

Science offers its solutions through innovation of new knowledge while biography discover its solutions through actions of past individuals.

6. Both increases knowledge.

Both biography and science helps in increasing the existing knowledge of the people.

They help in refining and improving knowledge that is beneficial to our societies.

7. Both are professional careers.

Both biography and science are professional career options that have lots of potential for improvement and achievements of the highest level of impact.

Moreover, the opportunities in both biography and science are very wide to accommodate all interested people.

Does biography involve scientific method?

Yes! In some cases, biography involves a scientific method of observation and interrogation techniques to find out facts and figures.

this is in other to prevent the appearance of false and misrepresentation of information that can cause harm to the person involved in the biography.

Advantages of biography to science

  1. Helps in developing and improving of analytical skills for scientists.
  2. Biography helps to show scientists the correct behaviour to be used while in scientific research laboratories.
  3. Helps in providing the background of previous research work.
  4. Help to showcase the continuity of scientific research.
  5. Helps widen the horizon of scientists.
  6. It also helps in the story of how scientific method developed.
  7. It teaches students the real accidental and ambiguous nature of science.

Disadvantages of biography to science.

  1. Something can misinterpret easily and misunderstand it.
  2. It is difficult to contextualise the concept.
  • The Ghost Map: The Story of London’s Most Terrifying Epidemic–and How It Changed Science, Cities, and the Modern World. by Steven Johnson.
  • The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense). By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • After Steve: How Apple Became a Trillion-Dollar Company and Lost Its Soul. By Tripp Mickle.
  • The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race. By Walter Isaacson.
  • Hidden Valley Road: Inside the Mind of an American Family. By Robert Kolker.
  • Exact Thinking in Demented Times. The Vienna Circle and the Epic Quest for the Foundations of Science. Karl Sigmund, Douglas R Hofstadtes.
  • Sid Meier’s Memoir!: A Life in Computer Games
  • Einstein: His Life and Universe. Walter Isaacson
  • Nathaniel Bowditch and the Power of Numbers. How a Nineteenth-Century Man of Business, Science, and the Sea Changed American Life. Tamara Plakins Thornton
  • Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future. Ashlee Vance.
  • Journey to the Edge of Reason: The Life of Kurt Gödel. Stephen Budiansky
  • Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science (Children’s Health Defense) by [Judy Mikovits, Kent Heckenlively, Robert Jr. F. Kennedy]
  • Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases. By Kent Heckenlively.
  • Trailblazers. 33 Women in Science Who Changed the World. By Rachel Swaby
  • The Perfect Predator: A Scientist’s Race to Save Her Husband from a Deadly Superbug: A Memoir. By Steffanie strathdee.
  • World History Biographies
  • Isaac Newton: The Scientist Who Changed Everything. By Philip Steele
  • The Disruptors: Data Science Leaders: Collective Biographies of Influential Leaders: Vol I. By Kate Strachnyi
  • Faraday, Maxwell, and the Electromagnetic Field: How Two Men Revolutionized Physics
  • Zero. The Biography of a Dangerous Idea. Charles Seife

Conclusion.

From the above detailed explanations, we discovered that biography is not science as a result of several factors such as lack of scientific method in biography, relying on past events, the unchangeable nature of facts, and good storytelling.

We also discovered that they differ in tracking fresh development, wider coverage, uniformity of views and new knowledge discovery.

Sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_YidTB6Beg/

https://www.jstor.org/stable/29737517/

You May Also Like